Showing posts with label computers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label computers. Show all posts

Web clips for 1/31/10 iPad™ Edition!!!!!

0 comments

Meet the iPad™. It's a magical and revolutionary device. Magical....really? is it really magical?

It's certainly popular.

Everything is certainly abuzz. Even Pee-Wee's got one. MadTV predicted it.

But it's probably not magical. Yea, not magical. What I notice is that it's priced at $500 for the base model, with just 16GB of storage. The 64GB model brings it up to $700. You can buy 2 fairly powerful netbooks for that price. And at least they'll have USB, Flash, and a 160GB hard drive. 

And no flash. Looks like Apple hurt Adobe's feelings. To the extent that they supposedly "played the porn card." Though that turned out to be just an employee making a joke.


It seems it's a bit like Obama.


People certainly have great expectations for it. They say it's going to kill the Kindle. The accessory market is gonna explode. Google had better watch out. It'll jump-start the job market. And it's even going to change the way kids grow up. Really. it's just that cool. I hear it'll also give you a blowjob if you buy the app.

But seriously people, where are our priorities?

With all of this controversy flying around, I'm reminded of just one thing.

Cool Thing Of The Week: Windows 7

0 comments
So yea, I migrated from XP to Windows 7 (64 bit) today. It took about 2 hours, and so far I have to say that I'm pretty impressed. It's damn snappy, boots up faster than XP ever did, and is full of little touches that become second nature very quickly. I've also got to say that I have had some compatibility issues with some older hardware (an ancient pci ethernet card that stopped being supported in 2006) but a suprisingly pleasant time otherwise. So far I've yet to run into any hiccups or really any issues at all. I'm sure a lot of this has to do with the hardware upgrade - I got 4 GB of ram super cheap over labor day weekend, bringing me to a total of 6 GB. I also installed it on a 10,000 RPM HDD, so you could attribute some of the speed increases to hardware. You could, that is, until I told you that I'm dual booting XP and 7, and that they're both playing nice. For anyone that's ever used a Microsoft OS, that will be a bit of a shock. MS never really liked supporting dual booting all that much, but the 7 installer make it extremely simple. So basically, 7 shows Microsoft doing a lot of things right - a focus on performance, finally accepting that some people might want more than one OS on their system, and far fewer resources consumed than Vista. It's the 98SE/ME/XP saga all over again.

PC Gaming is dead!

0 comments
Yeah, like I said before, anyone who says this can safely be disregarded, as they are either a blithering idiot that mindlessly repeats whatever the internet tells them or they have a serious problem with cognitive thinking. PC gaming is going to be thriving for as long as PC's exist, plain and simple. I'm not talking about flash games and bejeweled clones, either. Yes, PC gaming has lost market shares and revenue to consoles. Yes, major developers like Epic have ditched their PC roots for consoles. Yes, many bigger budget titles are being developed cross platform. Many people bemoan this as the decline of PC games, I see it as a good thing. That's right, large developers leaving the PC platform is good. You see, when all the companies who are chasing the dollars of the mainstream have left, that leaves the companies who make games because, you know, they like to make games. Stardock, Valve, TaleWorlds, Zero-Point software, 3000 Ad; all these companies are based around creating games that they want to play, and getting funding from other people who enjoy those types of games. It's no coincidence that all these companies are self-published - so the business decisions are being made by people who actually know the business, and not a bunch of suits obsessed with fellating shareholders. I can't stand Darek Smart's games. They're clunky, obtuse, buggy as hell, and visually unappealing. Yet I think it's awesome that he can continue to fund and produce games that he enjoys, because other people enjoy his games enough to finance them. Now, these markets have always been there, and they would thrive even without consoles drawing away the money chasers. Still, the fact remains that games are an expensive media, and large publishers have more marketing dollars than anyone else, meaning that many great titles have been lost in a sea of dog turds. Now, most of the dog turds are going to the consoles, giving smaller developers some breathing room. So now, PC gaming isn't dying. It's losing alot of fat. Just like in people, this weight loss means a happier, healthier industry.

*Insert trend here* is Dead!

1 comments
This happens every so often. A journalist will come crawling out of the woodwork, spot a product going into a decreasing trend, and crow about how desktop computers are dead or something else equally as idiotic. I don't know if it's just an attempt to grab page hits or the writer genuinely not having a basic grasp of economics (or reality,) but it's quite depressing to see an article like that get any attention. Really, the writer of that article should be gently shushed and led into an isolated room where he cannot embarrass himself further. Desktops aren't dead. PC Gaming isn't dead. There's a difference between "no longer dominant" and "dead." Desktops have lost a large chunk of the market to laptops, but the thing is, desktops never actually "owned" that demographic. My mom, for example, has owned two desktops and two laptops. She basically uses a computer for email, to look up directions, news, or other information on the internet, and to store pictures from her camera and email them to people. That's it. She gets on it maybe 5-6 times a day for a few minutes at a time. A few years down the line, when the computer is old, slow, and the cheap hardware starts to fail, she buys a new one. Most computer users are like my mom. Most computer users have always been best served by a laptop. So these massive sales decreases don't represent the decline of the desktop, they represent the desktop losing a market that it got by default because there wasn't any competition. A desktop is superior to a laptop in almost every way (the one area it loses out on is convenience and portability.) A desktop will be faster, cooler (in the temperature sense,) cheaper, and longer lasting than a comparative laptop - especially if it is built from scratch. If you do more than two or three hours of work at a computer a day in one place, you are better served by a desktop. The difference between 5400 rpm and 7200 rpm won't bother my mom, but someone working for extended periods will. And that's not even bringing 10000 rpm drives into account. Second, dual monitors have been shown to produce a large increase in productivity. If you're plugging your laptop into dual monitors all the time, you're basically using a gimped desktop with none of the advantages of a laptop. Finally, little boosts like cheaper ram, faster processor, and a better videocard all might not make a huge difference, but it adds up to a significantly smoother experience when you're at your computer longer than a half hour. There's also the economics of it. Americans can afford to buy a replacement computer every few years. Most of the rest of the world can't. I can double my desktop's processor speed and add two more cores for $200 - and that's before I overclock it (which I can do because of my large heatsinks and well-ventilated case.) I can spend about $50 a year to keep my desktop cutting edge. I don't even need to buy peripherals more than once, because my monitor, mouse, keyboard, and speakers are going to last me at least 5 more years. So desktops aren't dead. They've just stopped serving a market that didn't really want them in the first place. Desktops are going to be around far longer than the self-important journalists who prophesize their demise, at any rate. I own a desktop and a netbook, because each plays to it's strengths. The netbook is portable, the desktop powerful, and neither is going to die out anytime soon.

WD TV HD Media Player: The Pirate's Media Center

0 comments
 
So, you've "acquired" digital media. Movies, music, pictures, TV. It's all in different formats and it's all stuck on your computer. How do you sit at home, break out the Doritos, and watch it on your TV? Well, you could drop $900+ on a Home Theater PC, or the cheaper option is to burn DVDs (assuming you have a DVD burner and player) which takes hours to do (encoding time, burning time, setup etc.).

But here's the thing. And the thing is called the Western Digital WD TV HD Media player. It's a little box (just over 6 inches long) with 2 USB ports, a composite TV out, an HDMI out, and a remote.

"But how do I use this thing to fix the issue you bring up?" you may ask. Well, it's simple: Plug any USB drive with media on it into the WD TV, plug the WD TV into your TV, and enjoy.

Yup, it's that friggin' simple, just plug in your external hard drive to the WD TV, and it plays the media on it. WD TV supports a ton of video formats, from .avi files encoded pretty much any way there is to HD .mkv files to .mpegs to .movs. It plays a ton of audio formats as well, including more obscure ones like .flac and .ogg, as well as your standard .gif, .jpeg, .bmp, .png image formats. Plus the firmware gets updated regularly with close ties to the community over at the WD TV Wiki.

It's also really portable, since the device itself is small, everything is truly plug and play, and all you'll have to lug around is your external media. Really, WD TV will accept pretty much anything that can be recognized as a "mass storage device" so even flash drives, SD cards and readers, or cameras can be used.

The kicker: this little box will set you back $100. Though I've seen it on sale at various times for around $70. Still, that's not too much considering I've personally found mine to be the most convenient way, not only to play my digital media on the TV, but to bring it with me everywhere.

Oh, and it's not like the device was designed to be used for pirated media. But hey, neither was Bit Torrent.

The interface is dead simple, and includes the ability to index the media on the drives connected to it, as well as simple file browsing. It's truly an awesome device.

WD TV.

WD TV at Newegg.

Web Clips for 6/17/09

0 comments
Once again, substantive things are in the works, just hold on while I finish this level.

Best graphics cards for the money, for June. Very trustworthy source.

Countdown timer, on the web.

Make reading on the web better.

I'm a huge fan of this guy. Download all his music legally and for free on Jamendo.

Decode all of those tinyurls.

You Are Beautiful installations.

Yakko counts tibet.

And you're not official without an official seal.

Oh yea, I'm playing around with the banner again. One of these days I'll get it.

Favicons!

0 comments

Yup, I'm playing around, trying to make a custom favicon for our site. I kinda fail at it, so I figured I'd open it up to anyone.

Email us your own custom tartar-saucey favicon (a 16x16 or 32x32 .png, .gif, or.ico image) and if it's good I'll probably use it. Just send it to tips@thetartarsauce.com, and I'll take a look.

Other authors are welcome to contribute as well.

The Aliens, They're Telling Us Something

0 comments
Well, maybe I couldn't get you to switch, but super intelligent beings from outer space? They know what's what.

http://maps.google.com/

10 Lesser-known Music Players for Windows and Linux (And a Few For Mac)

0 comments
iTunes, Windows Media Player, Winamp, maybe RealPlayer. Other than that, you don't see the average music listener using much else to manage and listen to their music. But what if you're no average music listener? What if your needs extend beyond simple playback features? What if you want multiple libraries? What if you're frustrated with the bloat and useless features of these players? Well there's a ton of things out there for you.

Maybe it's because I'm restless, maybe it's because I'm a geek, but I tend to change my main audio player at least twice a month. I dunno, I think the way we listen to music effects how we feel when we listen to it. For example, the way I react to music is much different when I'm listening to headphones versus a speaker system. The music effects me differently when I'm on a bus versus by myself in my room (and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in this, right?).

The difference is (obviously) more subtle when doing something as simple as switching an audio player, but it's still there. The way I navigate and control my music influences my choices and changes the listening experience. Audiophiles will also tell you that different music players actually sound different from each other, as players often use different techniques to process, EQ, and produce sound. I, despite my decent ear, couldn't tell you the sound differences between Winamp and iTunes, but keep an ear out.

So, through my geekery and various audio explorations, I've come across quite a few music players that deserve more credit than they get. Most are for Windows and Linux, a few are cross-platform. Some are more well-known than others, and they all vary in features. All are free to download and use, and most are open source. So without further ado, in no particular order, here's 10 of 'em. Oh, and click on all of the thumbnails to see bigger versions, but you knew that.


1. Amarok (Linux, Windows(beta), Mac(beta))
Amarok is probably the most popular player on this list. It is (arguably) probably the most popular audio player for linux. It's got somewhat of a cult following, as fans of the player tend to get a little crazy about it, and for good reason. Amarok is incredibly full-featured, while still offering the user freedom to manage their music in any way they see fit. Whereas iTunes says, "Here's how I'm going to manage your music." Amarok says, "It's your music, how do you want me to manage it?" Amarok can create a library with your structure of choice, index what you have, browse and play music through a built-in file browser, music can be dragged-and-dropped into the playlist, there's crossfade, EQ, effects, analyzers, visualizers, plug-ins, lyrics fetchers, even an online music store, magnatune. Probably my favorite feature is the ability to fetch wikipedia information about the artist and display it in the side panel. I switch audio players a lot, but I was hooked on Amarok for a good 8 months or so, which says a lot. The screenshot is of Amarok 1.4.4, but version 2.0 recently came out for linux and a beta version 2 is out for windows and Mac. Amarok 2 sports a cleaner, easier interface and a ton of new features that I just couldn't cover in one article.


2. Songbird (Windows, Mac, Linux)
Songbird is often referred to as an iTunes clone (as it manages music and indexes data in much the same way, plus it looks kinda similar), but it is so much more than that. It's built on gecko, the same engine they use to make Firefox, so in addition to a music player, it's also a full-fledged web browser offering a ton of popular extensions and skins. It's got a ton of seamless music-web-integration features that make it an awesome tool for discovering new artists, scrobbling, playing web files, and reading media blogs. It's also got your set of EQ features, visualizers and playlist capabilities. You can even save bookmarks, blogs, pages, video, and your own music all to the same playlist. And, of course, it'll manage your iPod without blinking. A really great player that many are calling an "iTunes killer."


3. Exaile (Linux)
Exaile aims to be very similar to Amarok, though unlike Amarok, which is built for the KDE window manager, Exaile is built for seamless GNOME integration. In addition to having (almost) everything that Amarok has to offer, Exaile brings a ton of its own cool features to table. The interface is slightly different, and it includes a built-in shoutcast directory browser, tabbed playlists (allowing for multiple open playlists), iPod integration and scrobbling, and Guitar tab fetching. If you're a GNOME die-hard, or just want what feels like a cleaner, tweaked version of Amarok, then check it out.


4. VLC Media Player (Windows, Mac, Linux)
VLC is like the swiss army knife of media players, you can throw pretty much any media file at it, on a computer without any codecs installed, and it'll play without any problems. It's actually fairly well known and pretty popular in terms of video players, but there was a subtle feature addition in the recent 0.9 release: the inclusion of a simple media library, album art fetching, and updated playlist features. This makes VLC now a pretty darn good audio player. The EQ is fast and fantastic, the playlist is simple and effective, and while it's management features are lacking, if non-existent, for the many of us who have our own folder structure and prefer dragging and dropping 'a la Winamp, VLC is a really great choice. One of its greatest features is its stability. Especially for audio files, VLC will practically never crash. It can also drive more volume than any other player I've used, so if you've got soft speakers, using VLC will definitely allow you to get some more sound out of them (and potentially blow them, so be careful). It's got a fairly lucrative plug-in community, and it's audio features are extremely robust. It'll never get in your face, it's not flashy, but what it lacks in library management and looks, it more than makes up for in no-nonsense power and advanced audio features.


5. Freeamp/Zinf (Windows)

Freeamp (now called Zinf due to copyright issues) hearkens back to older versions of Winamp, and hit its popularity peak around the same time as Winamps' as an open source alternative to the popular player. Unlike Winamp, however, Freeamp updates very conservatively and acts very much like Winamp 1 or 2. So if you're disappointed as to the way Winamp's gone and want something simpler, Freeamp is a good choice. It's got the same simple library features of older Winamp versions and even some downloading features. Though the main focus of this player is no-nonsense music playback, the same philosophy that made Winamp so popular back in the day.


6. Audacious (Linux, Mac (third-party port))
Audacious is fantastic. If Freeamp is like older Winamp, then Audacious is similar to new Winamp --at least on the outside. It's got a strikingly similar interface and for basic playback it works in much the same way offering simple drag-and-drop smart playlist creation. Its features differ greatly, however. It's got a really advanced audio playback engine (It was originally a fork of BMP) which is considerably more powerful than GStreamer and offers a ton of features. It's got the ability to use different output systems for playback, voice removal, transcoding, fast EQ, alarm, gamepad support, streaming, scrobbling, LADSPA support, and a pretty strong skinning and plugin community. It's also got wonderful metadata editing features. A lot of it's feature focus is on offering things that no other player has, and that's what has made it probably the second most popular player on linux. I always find my way to audacious when I'm looking for a simple and powerful player with that one niche feature no one else has.


7. Floola (Linux, Mac, Windows)
Floola is the iPod-lover's best friend, offering a complete and total replacement for iTunes. Though it doesn't support iPod touch or iPhone, the rest of us get a billion iPod centric features that truly liberate you from the vice of iTunes. Floola allows you to add and extract songs to and from the ipod from any computer, anywhere. It can automatically convert videos and movies to the right format as well as music, and it's got easy and powerful automatic podcast managment and sorting. It can manage, import, and export playlists, fetch album art and lyrics, even on older iPods. It can manage notes, synchronize to google calendar, add photos effortlessly, even automatically add web videos to the iPod by simply copying the url of the video. It can fix a broken iPod and recover files, search for duplicates, use system notifications, and even export your songs to HTML. Oh, did I mention it plays and manages music? Probably my favorite feature is the fact that it's just a standalone app/exe/executable, so you can put it directly on your iPod (or anywhere, really) and use it on any computer, with any Operating System. Of course, it's not all that useful if you don't have an iPod (or a motorola phone that supports iTunes), but for iPod owners, this is not just a great management and playback app, it's a must-have tool.


8. 1by1 (Windows, Linux (with WINE))
1by1 is the ultimate in minimalist music management. In fact, it doesn't even manage music. Dubbed, "the directory player" by it's creator, 1by1 has a simple, tree-based, two panel file browser. double clicking a music file will play it and all tracks in the folder. For those who like to manually manage their music with a folder structure of their own, 1by1 is the perfect counterpart. It also works well with those who use iTunes since iTunes automatically sorts your music by artist in a fairly neat folder structure. Like Floola, it's portable and can be put on a flash drive and carried anywhere. What's more it's tiny --just 100kb! It still has your basic features like gapless playback, crossfading, and audio enhancement, though it lacks an EQ. It's got almost no resource usage, and can read filenames directly or pull and display track metadata. it can rename files while playing them, and edit and delete directories while in use. It supports bookmarks and playlists (though you'll never use that), and can remember past places. All in all it's for the person who just wants to play what's in a folder. Simple, no-bullshit music playback.


9. Minirok (linux)
Minirok is one of my favorite players. Think of it as the bastard child of Amarok and 1by1. It's written in Python and is based largely on Amarok code, though almost everything in Amarok has been stripped out in favor of the same minimalist 1by1 playback philosophy. In the left panel is a tree-style file browser, and the right panel is an Amarok-style playlist that can be edited, cleared, and switched around. One of Miniroks' unique features is the ability to generate metadata from a filename. It can perform searches from the tree view and the playlist, and music can only be populated from drag-and-drop. Playback works and feels similar to Amarok, though most advanced audio options like EQ have been taken out. It's got global key bindings and custom shortcuts to be totally manageable from the keyboard or system tray, and it can also scrobble. Other than that, it's really just meant to play music. If you find yourself using Amarok or Exaile, but not using the library, and instead using the "Files" tab, you'll probably find Minirok to be a much cleaner, nicer app.


10. Aqualung (linux, Windows)
Aqualung is very much its own thing. It's got a few similarities to other programs, but on the whole it's unique. The interface is customizable, offering inline player and playlist or separation of the two. it's got a music library and good CD importing features. It's got all your advanced EQ effects, and it has tabbed, customizable playlists as well as keyboard shortcuts, streaming radio, podcast support, it supports a wide range of formats, and, like Audacious, can output to multiple drivers. It supports LADSPA by default and can be controlled completely by the command line. The interface feels very unique, with nothing really standing out as similar to another player, and the tabbed playlists are done very well. It seems like it's meant to be customized by the user, there's a bunch of different skins and making your own is pretty easy. The different windows can be put together into one big player or made as small and unobtrusive as you like. This player really follows none of the rules and is a good choice if you're looking for something different --from everything.


Well, there you have it. 10 lesser-known music players. If you're a geek you probably already know many of these, but there's hundreds more of them out there, and I encourage you to go hunting for something you like. After all, why shouldn't your music player be as unique as your music?

Simple DVD Burning in Linux with DeVeDe

0 comments
I usually use DVD Flick to convert, author, and burn dvd's in windows and until recently, in Linux too with wine. Unfortunately, the latest version wasn't working for one reason or another, and I decided to look for an alternative, perhaps something Linux native (I've only brought my laptop home for christmas break and it runs Linux. XP drivers aren't available for it so my only choices were Linux or Vista). Anyway, I've always found authoring and burning a DVD natively under Linux to be a little complicated, if not just plain anoying. Not that I don't roll up my sleeves and break out the CLI when things need to get done, but come on. I'm on vacation here, and if there's a simple way where I can just click through a few menus and go watch TV then I'd rather do that.
Enter DeVeDe: a fairly-simple-yet-still-powerful authoring tool that only requires around five dependencies. You pick your titles and files, select your options in a faux-wizard format, and boom. An .iso ready for burning and watching. There's even options for creating DVD menus for chapters and episodes, and a good amount of the advanced options for bit rate and such can be found. A really nicely done program overall. It's apparent that a lot of thought was put into making the program easy to use without leaving power users in the dark. There's also a Windows version that might even pry me away from DVD flick. Happy burning. (All images from the DeVeDe website)

Review: The "Master Chef" Part 1

0 comments
My crazy Panamaniac greasemonkey weightlifter uncle decided it was due time his soon-to-be-12-year-old son got a computer for himself. New generation huh? Anyway I convinced him that building a computer from scratch would be a better option than getting one from a store or company. The system would later be named the "Master Chef." The simple reasons you should build your own computer versus buy one are as follows:
  • You get WAY more power for WAY less price (usually 2x or more).
  • The build will be more stable and the hardware is less likely to fail.
  • There are many more configuration options without the worry of breaking a warranty.
  • The cool factor, it's a computing codpiece.
Sure you don't get tech support, but when was the last time Dell or HP tech support actually helped you? Don't answer that, it was rhetorical, I know the answer to that, it's never because you motherfuckers call me all the fucking time when you can't find the start menu or can't figure out fucking iTunes. It's FUCKING ITUNES!! GOOGLE IT! .......anyway maybe I'll save that rant for another post. So the short is you should always build your own desktop instead of buying a new one. Yea yea so my cousin was getting one and I offered to build it for him. So I hunted for a lil' bit and came up with this list of parts with which I made a public wish list on Newegg Including the rebates it comes to $803.92. without the monitor thats $633.93. Pretty sexy considering if you want to buy a computer with similar specs and video card it'd cost you around $1,750 with a monitor and $1,300 without. The parts simply explained are as follows: A sexy Cooler Master RC-690 case that came with a 550 watt power supply: I chose it for it's good looks, price (at the time it was $99), included power supply, trusted brand, and good reviews. A decent MSI P7N-SLI motherboard: I probably would've gone with this ASUS model instead, but the price was just a little too high. Wasn't a bad decision though, and I'm a fan of the 750 chipset. 4Gig of OCZ Gold RAM: I haven't had much personal experience with OCZ, but the price was right and I wasn't building a computer for myself. I'd heard good things and this was a good time to check it out. An Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 running at 2.53Ghz: This is where I saved my money. Had I more to spend I would've gone with the E8200, which has a 1333mhz FSB and runs at 2.66Ghz, but it was just so much more money. A Western Digital 250Gb Hard Drive: I don't skimp on hard drives, I've bought this drive before for my builds and have always found it to be rock solid stable, whisper quiet, and blazing fast. I buy exlusively Western Digital because thier drives have never ever ever given me a problem as opposed to other companies. An EVGA GeForce 8800GT 512: I spent a little more for the trusted EVGA brand, but thier customer service is outstanding. A friend of mine busted his from stupid overclocking and they replaced it no problem, with free shipping. This thing hauls ass too, about the 3rd fastest card you can get without going SLI, and for $115 after rebate, I couldn't resist. A BenQ G2000WD 20.1 inch widescreen LCD monitor: It was cheap, had good reviews and color depth, and a decent 5ms response time for gaming. Can't go wrong with BenQ either. And finnally a LITE-ON 20x SATA DVD burner: Honestly it was the cheapest SATA DVD Burner on Newegg. The reviews were fine. I Don't have too much experience with burners and ussually just buy the cheapest no-name brand I can find. I've never had a problem with any drive I've bought. This time though, the cheapest drive was a name-brand LITE-ON. So I guess God is telling me it's time to get a name-brand disc drive. That's enough for this time, next time I'll go through the building process and start detailed reviews. As well as rate the system as a whole and compare it to other...things. Till next time. BOO! scared? Are you ready? Are you ready for this? Are you hanging on the edge of your seat?